George Zimmerman Trial And Trayvon Martin Case - 980 Words

Synopsis: George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watchman, shot and killed 17 year old Trayvon Marin in Sampson, Florida on March 25th, 2012.In the police report, Zimmerman claimed to have followed Martin out of the convenience store because he looked suspicious and that is when the altercation between the two began. Some words were shared between the two that led Zimmerman to step out of his car despite the police’s order to remain inside the vehicle. Zimmerman also told police that Trayvon knocked him down when he punched him in the nose and repeatedly slammed his head on the ground and that he had only reached for his gun because he feared for his life. The incident ended when 13 year old Austin Brown saw Zimmerman lying in the grass moaning and crying for help. Police soon arrived after a 911 call about hearing gunshots in the distance from another neighbor (Gutman, 2012). Fine details from that eventful night that would later be used in the investigation and trial are still lef t unanswered. The George Zimmerman trial and Trayvon Martin case was probably one of the controversial and confusing cases in Florida history. One of the key elements used in the case was that of the Florida’s Stand Your Ground Law. The Stand Your Ground Law states that â€Å"if reasonable you believe that you face imminent death, serious bodily injury, rape, kidnapping or (in most states) robbery, you can use deadly force against the assailant even if you have a perfectly safe avenue or retreat,†Show MoreRelatedThe Death Of The United States1249 Words   |  5 Pages28-year-old mixed Hispanic George Zimmerman, calls 911 to report a suspicious person. â€Å"This guy looks like he’s up to no good, or he’s on drugs or something. It’s raining and he’s just walking around, looking about† (Genius). That suspicious person was 17-year-old African American Trayvon Martin returning home after stopping by a local convenience store to purchase, the now infamous, Arizona Ice tea and Skittles. When the 911 dispatcher asked Zimmerman if he was following Martin he replied â€Å"yeah.† TheRead MoreXBCOM 275 Debate Paper1638 Words   |  7 Pages Dr. Jim Burrescia The issue that is the subject of my debate paper is the George Zimmerman trial. George Zimmerman, 28 years old at the time, shot and killed 17 year old Trayvon Martin on February 26, 2012 in Sanford, Florida. Zimmerman was the neighborhood watch patrolman and Martin was visiting his father who lived in the gated community where the shooting occurred. Zimmerman called the non-emergency number to report a suspicious male walking in the neighborhood. He was toldRead MoreTrayvon Martin Case Essay1268 Words   |  6 Pagesinnocent minor, Trayvon Martin, was shot to his death in a gated neighborhood in Sanford, Florida. The shooter, George Zimmerman, still has not faced any serious consequence for the murder. Many people in the Sanford community, and even around the country, believe that there is no question that Zimmerman should be convicted and sent to jail, but, unfortunately, it is not up to the people; it is up to the justice system. With the consideration of Florida’s state l aws, this is a difficult case to foreseeRead MoreTrayvon Martin vs George Zimmerman1415 Words   |  6 PagesTrayvon Martin was killed by a neighborhood watchman, George Zimmerman. He says that it was self defense, but after the tragic phone call was released to the media everything took a huge turn questioning if it was a hate crime. If Zimmerman would have stayed in his car that night then Trayvon would still be alive. It could not be self-defense if all Travon had in his hand were skittles and some tea. The whole thing blew up right after it was released to the news. Then when it was time for the trialRead MoreStand Your Ground Laws Essay1590 Words   |  7 Pagesthey believed that doing so would prevent significant bodily damage or death. The purpose of creating laws such as the Stand Your Ground Laws was to obliterate any confusion about when an individual can protect themselves and to eradicate certain trials where people who lawfully used self-defense even though they firs t had not attempted to retreat from the threat. However, in my opinion the Stand Your Ground law is a dangerous alternative compared to the safe concept known as duty to retreat. AllRead MoreThe Justice System Is Not Truly Provide Justice For All839 Words   |  4 PagesStates has evolved after the Trayvon Martin case and Freddie Gray’s case? The American legal system does not truly provide justice for all. The first reason that many see as proof of how the justice system has failed is because of racial profiling. For example, Trayvon Martin, a black 17 year old with a pack of Skittles and Arizona tea was shot by a white male. Nadra Kareem Nittle from About.com states that â€Å"On Feb. 26, 2012, a neighborhood watchman named George Zimmerman gunned down the 17-year-oldRead MoreBlack Lives Matter Of America Essay1563 Words   |  7 PagesAmerican culture is supposed to be described as one that is built on the ideals of freedom, human equality, tolerance, and the respect for each other’s differences; all of this is what is suppose to make our nation so significant, sadly this is not the case for our nation. Throughout our American history we have learned about racial discrimination events that have taken place against African-Americans like slavery, the Civil War, the lynching and race riots caused by the Ku Klux Klan, the Jim Crow LawsRead MoreThe Shooting of Trayvon Martin: George Zimmerman Essay1489 Words   |  6 PagesOn the night of his death, February 26, 2012, Trayvon Martin was in Sanford, Florida on a visit to his fathers fiancee and her son at The Retreat at Twin Lakes. As Zimmerman noticed him he called the police non-emergency number to report a suspicious person in community, describing Martin as a very suspicious guy reporting that he had his hand in waistband and was walking around looking at homes. Also, Zimmerman is quoted saying that â€Å"he is just walking around looking about in the rain†, and â€Å"ThisRead MoreGeorge Zimmerman Trial2843 Words   |  12 PagesState of Florida v. George Zimmerman Abstract Our group chose to do the highly debatable case regarding George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin. Based on the various parts from group members, it would seem we have both sides of the case so there will be discussion from either point of view. Our paper is not going to sway the reader in either direction, but simply state the facts for each side and give an overview of the case from our perspective. Introduction Within the last year, our countryRead MoreAnalysis Of The Article Trayvon Martin Shooting : Voice Experts Claim Cries Heard On 911 Call Essay1199 Words   |  5 PagesZimmerman was not charged with any crime due to Florida Statutes Title XLVI Chapter 776 – Justifiable Use of Force, also known as Stand Your Ground, which states, â€Å"A person is presumed to have held a reasonable fear of imminent peril of death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another when using or threatening to use defensive force that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm to another†¦Ã¢â‚¬  With this law the â€Å"fear of death† only has to be imagined in order for use of deadly

Annotated Bibliography Of The Data After Completion Of...

The summary of the collected data after completion of usability study states that among the 30 individuals around 56.6% people has used the manage blocking setting for the purpose of blocking the user’s/game requests/app requests etc. And around 43.3% of participants never used the manage blocking setting. While coming to the reason behind the usage most of the people stated that the major reason behind the usage of the setting is receiving the anonymous messages from the unknown people. And few of the people also stated that for ensuring privacy and few other stated that they ignored stated that they find usage as they are getting consequent message request from a specific individual and they felt irritated by the experience and find†¦show more content†¦The reason behind the task is to know about the user’s experience of the performed task and to bring awareness among the people who does not know about the blocking setting and also to make people aware of the changes occurred in the setting from past to present. Around 1 person has not responded to this task. When I questioned about the satisfaction of the setting my mean is to know about the user satisfaction and also about the satisfaction regarding the updated or modified setting. And around 93.1% among 29 people felt that this updated setting is satisfying whereas around 6.9% feel that they are not satisfied for this updated setting or blocking setting.1 person has not responded for the task. When the participants are questioned regarding the receiving of app or game requests for this question around 28 people answered among 30 people and in 28 people around 42.8% people refused to receive application requests and around 46.2% people showed their interests in receiving the app requests and 10.7% students said they are interested for only some applications. When I asked users did they ever felt annoyed when they experience a request 21 among 28 people opined that its annoying and 2 p eople felt that sometimes they feel annoying and around 5 people feel that they don’t feel irritated. I have provided options like a prefer to block all app/game requests b prefer to not block any c prefer to blockShow MoreRelatedInformation Technology Implementation Issues: an Analysis45771 Words   |  184 Pagesdevelopment and deployment. The issues represented in this study are addressed in the context of IT implementation processes, especially with regard to the question of the needs and perceptions of administrators from the local government arena. In addition, this study will provide an exploratory look at the problematic issues surrounding IT implementation and how local government administrators--in particular--perceive them. More specifically, this study provides the following: a discussion of managementRead MoreLibrary Management204752 Words   |  820 PagesClassification, Tenth Edition Arlene G. Taylor LIbRaRy and InfoRMaTIon CenTeR ManageMenT Seventh Edition Robert D. Stueart and Barbara B. Moran Library and Information Science Text Series Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Stueart, Robert D. Library and information center management / Robert D. Stueart and Barbara B. Moran. — 7th ed. p. cm. — (Library and information science text series) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978–1–59158–408–7 (alk. paper)

Corporate Governance & Ethics Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Corporate Governance Ethics. Answer: Overriding responsibility of the boards of publicly-listed companies is to create shareholder value and that all other board governance responsibilities are secondary to the goal of maximizing shareholder valueThe responsibilities of the directors of the public listed companies are as follows: The directors and the company secretaries have been assigned a huge responsibility in the Company under the Corporation Act .The functions are: Obligations to the director for keeping record of the financials and passing of the solvency resolutions All he listed Companies are required to lodge and present the annual statements with the ASIC and they must constantly keep the record for the changes to the company The liabilities and the restriction imposed on the director of the company. Usually the Board of the listed company is entrusted with a huge responsibility. They are as follows: They provide the company for the leadership and creating strategic objectives of the company They help in appointing the Managing Director and to chair the senior independent director of the company The directors help in the appointment of the CEO of the company and also the appointment and replacement (Armstrong et al, 2015) The director helps in the appointment and also the replacement of the senior executive and this is done through passing of the resolution in various meetings of the company They oversee the company strategic objectives as well as manage the operating The directors check that the that the entity complies with the accounting and the reporting system and also sees that the company complies with the regulation of the Act The need to ensure that the incentives for executive directors and other senior executives encourage them to pursue the growth and success of the entity without taking undue risks The director ensures that there is a functioning on the reporting system. The director of the company ensures that there is satisfactory control of the company's and Group's compliance with laws and other regulations that apply to the operations. In approving a formal work plan and instruction to the CEO annually the directors play a vital role (Davis and Chu,2015). In approving the financial reporting and the form of interim reports and the year-end reports and annual accounts and publish it in the newspaper In reality the listed companies has to keep the shareholders value since they are vital for the growth and sustainability of the company. Many companies have introduced stock option as a major component of executive compensation. The idea of the directors and the management was to align the interest of the management with those of the shareholders. To start the vesting periods, combined with a belief that short-term earnings fuel stock prices, encouraged executives to manage earnings, exercise their options early, and cash out opportunistically (Dimopoulos and Wagner, 2016). The governance and the features of the listed companies help in the transparency and awareness of the company and the management. Corporate governance is a very important factor for the public listed company. Many responsibilities of the management is upon the shareholders of company. With the norms are regulated and there is globalization and privatization of the companies which will eventually improve the Corporate Governance and this is one of the important issue of the OECD program me (Jain and Jamali, 2016). Overriding function of the directors in creating shareholders value The Board of directors of the public listed companies have overriding duties which is to manage the affairs the of the company and act as a link between the owners and the employees therefore the directors and the company secretary has to manage the affairs and business of the company and for the benefit and the interest so as give the return and so that the company is satisfied in the long run in the best possible way (Yoshikawa, Zhu and Wang, 2014). The Board of directors has the responsibility for ensuring that the organization has appropriate and the business is conducted in such a way that it is according to the requirement and it is appropriate in accordance to the articles of the Company and thus the company is able to apply the applicable laws and regulation and thereby to work as the requirement. The Board shall perform the Board work jointly under the leadership of the Chairman. The Board and the CEO will be able to fulfill the directors accordance to the guidelines and the direction of the company. The Board and the CEO has followed the instruction and guidelines of the companies. The members shall not be responsible for the business and the functions of the organization. The Board shall be responsible for different lines of business or functions. The CEO and the Chairman have prepared and presented the rest of the Board prior to decision (Larcker and Tayan, 2015). Goal of maximizing shareholder value is the primary goal for the company Every business Corporation makes available to the public the goods and services and thus earns the profit that attracts the investments and thereby enhancing the economy. The main aim of the business is to enhance the value of the company and thereby helps in the growth of the company (Lazonick, 2014). In order to improve the long term viability of the corporation and in order to improve the responsibility of the company and to take care for the well being of the society and the responsibility of the enterprises. The main objective of the business is to generate the economic returns to the owners. The directors as well as the CEO of the company should be focused on the shareholders value and the corporation will realize the value of the executives and the corporate board members and the shareholders will maximize the value of the shareholders. The shareholders value is defined as the present value of cash flow and the discounted rate that reflects the risk of the cash flows. The maximization of shareholders value is not the same as maximizing the short term profit as per share or manipulating stock prices through accounting fraud. The corporate governance focuses on the listed companies and particularly in the Countries which have developed economy. The main governance issue is to align with the legal and the institutional and regulatory framework that helps to align the interests of shareholders and managers. The Policy maker has the incentive to the Board and the management to act in the interest of the company and its shareholders; and furnish investors with sufficient monitoring information. The primary risk is that of the non controlling shareholders and it will end up ina situation where the controlling shareholder may use his or her position to deprive the non-controlling shareholder of influence over major decisions and significant distribution of the business earnings. Many Countries have the jurisdiction which prevents them to abuse the non controlling shareholders and this apply to both the listed and public companies (Lazonick, 2016). According to participants, a corporate governance framework elaborated listed companies could not only help to define the internal and external stakeholders expectations ex ante, but also, and more importantly, assist judiciaries, auditors, lawyers and other professionals in solving problems ex post. The prime responsibility of the corporate board of directors and this helps in protecting the shareholders asset and so that they can get a return on the investment. The boards of directors have a financial duty which helps in the shareholders value which is also known as the fiduciary duty. The board of directors is the highest governing authority within the management structure at a corporation or publicly traded business. It is the board's job to select, evaluate, and approve appropriate compensation for the company's chief executive officer (CEO). The particular ownership structure of a corporation has a huge impact on the effectiveness of the board of directors to govern. In a company where a large, single shareholder exists, that entity or individual investor can effectively control the corporation. If the director has a problem, he or she can appeal to the controlling shareholder. In a company where no controlling shareholder exists, the directors should act as if one did exist and attempt to protect this imaginary entity at all times. In a relatively few number of companies, the controlling shareholder also serves as the CEO and / or Chairman of the Board. In this case, a director is completely at the will of the owner and has no effective way to override his or her decisions (McCahery, Sautner and Starks, 2016). Corporate Governance helps in (1) It ensures the accountability and responsiveness of the corporation to its shareholders; (2) It promotes behaviors and compensation practices that reinforce a long-term perspective; and (3) It encourages a rich dialogue on matters of importance between investors and companies. The In order to focus on the enterprise and to improve the structure and then to focus on the maximization of shareholder value. Finally we can say that in order to improve the controlling power of the value-extracting CEO, including a) In banning stock buybacks (Omarova, 2016) b) In requiring executive compensation that rewards innovation rather than speculation and manipulation, and c) In placing stakeholders representing households as taxpayers, workers, and consumers on boards of directors of publicly listed companies, along with shareholders who represent households as savers. An intellectual precondition for these reforms is the rejection of the ideology that companies should be run to maximize shareholder value, which means replacing agency theory with innovation theory as a mode of analyzing how the operation of an economy, supported by the strategies and structures of the business enterprises within it, can attain the objectives of stable and equitable economic growth (Tricker and Tricker, 2015). Conclusion In these days, it is important to choose a corporate objective for the firm and t is extremely important that the determinants have a success or failure of a corporation in controlling the market. In order to gain shareholder value maximization and stakeholders interest satisfaction the key role is to create the profit for company. Which governance is an important objective which should be followed by the corporation and it helps in maximizing shareholder value or satisfying stakeholders interests or balancing the interests of shareholders and stakeholders. Every corporation helps to pursue their own goal. Thus in order to grow the company and for sustainability and wealth maximization it is important that the company focuses on the wealth for betterment and the directors play a vital role in this process. References Armstrong, C.S., Blouin, J.L., Jagolinzer, A.D. and Larcker, D.F., 2015. Corporate governance, incentives, and tax avoidance.Journal of Accounting and Economics,60(1), pp.1-17. Davis, G.F. and Chu, J.S., 2015. Stability and Change in Corporate Governance.Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource. Dimopoulos, T. and Wagner, H.F., 2016. Corporate Governance and CEO Turnover Decisions. Jain, T. and Jamali, D., 2016. Looking inside the black box: The effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility.Corporate Governance: An International Review,24(3), pp.253-273. Larcker, D. and Tayan, B., 2015.Corporate governance matters: A closer look at organizational choices and their consequences. Pearson Education. Lazonick, W., 2014. Profits without prosperity.Harvard Business Review,92(9), pp.46-55. Lazonick, W., 2016. The Value-Extracting CEO: How Executive Stock-Based Pay Undermines Investment in Productive Capabilities. McCahery, J.A., Sautner, Z. and Starks, L.T., 2016. Behind the scenes: The corporate governance preferences of institutional investors.The Journal of Finance,71(6), pp.2905-2932. Omarova, S.T., 2016. Bank Governance and Systemic Stability: The Golden Share Approach.Ala. L. Rev.,68, p.1029. Tricker, R.B. and Tricker, R.I., 2015.Corporate governance: Principles, policies, and practices. Oxford University Press, USA. Yoshikawa, T., Zhu, H. and Wang, P., 2014. National governance system, corporate ownership, and roles of outside directors: A corporate governance bundle perspective.Corporate Governance: An International Review,22(3), pp.252-265.